Back to Basic

Hi all, thanks for the comments. This render was generated about 4 years ago while i was new in Vray render. I agreed with all the comment made in this post and would like to thanks all for the time spend on this image. The reason why i post this work is to gather infomation from public and expert point of view. In trouble shooting from area to area acting as a check list for my present work and coming project.

I wish I was a world leader in Pixel Development In Visualization.

I go with Dave. Back to Basic shouldn't mean to forget about AO path, posing objects to a ground, make them cast shadows , make understand the lightsorce, objects don't overlap, furniture static, bump and displacement, UVW unwrap, making understand the architecture. . . The Idea is ok but observe the reality around you to understand why your try doesn't convince in realism, and I'm shure you improve much.

I really like the interior, especially the column

i feel a bit harsh saying this but in all honesty the best way to improve it would be to put it in the work in progress section and get rid of the pitch until the image is at the same quality of the world leaders. i would hate for it to rain if i lived in this house, all my kitchen equipment would be damaged based on the fact I can see the sky above those panton chairs (or the room behind those chairs). also the beam-like element above the chairs needs some contact shadows where it meets the wall. not too sure what material the floor is, wood? carpet? either way it needs more definition. the speaker also seems huge. turn it on it's side at it's nearly the same length of your couch. being really picky now as well but it seems you sofa is hovering slightly above ground. the vertical line that converges to the right side of the frame makes me feel uncomfortable when al lthe other vertical seem . . . well, vertical. the sky i was talking about above the kitchen seems to be different from that behind the trees. the clouds are really bright suggesting a powerful sun breaking through where as the lighting suggests an overcast day, as does the sky behind the trees my final point is that i get the feeling the house relies purely on natural light? i can't see any artificial lights anywhere

I agree with the other replies. Maybe also add some details in the materials? Better wood structure?

Thank You for your comments, is there any other way to improve this image?

well I could buy with the rock-thingy concept but not the hollow transparent cushions and overall the materials and lighting could use some tuning

no offence but the image doesn't back up the little sales pitch underneath it. i don't quite understand the twisted wooden planks that overlap, or the meteor that's hit the back of house, and the transparent hollow cushions need fixing