Modern Market VTB

2. There is a LOT going on in both images - almost sensory overload. Especially in the 2nd image - the building is so obscured by trees, cars, people, etc that I don't understand the design. The focus is dominated by the car/people out front. While the quality of the renders are ok, I think you should seriously reconsider the amount of "stuff" that dilutes the architecture. 4. Most renderings suffer from not having ENOUGH life + vitality, whereas, with these images, it's almost TOO much. The architecture should stand by itself and be complimented by the life engaging it. This almost feels like bad architecture being covered up.

It looks like the future of Globalism & over consumerism, but I like it, it's different almost like a theme park, made me smile & feel nervous at the same time!

Comments: 1. The balloons are exactly the same on both sides of the image. Consider varying them? 2. There is a LOT going on in both images - almost sensory overload. Especially in the 2nd image - the building is so obscured by trees, cars, people, etc that I don't understand the design. The focus is dominated by the car/people out front. While the quality of the renders are ok, I think you should seriously reconsider the amount of "stuff" that dilutes the architecture. 3. The materials applied to the actual self-modeled areas of the renderings (meaning the models not imported from 3rd parties) need work. It is difficult to understand what types of materials are being used. 4. Most renderings suffer from not having ENOUGH life + vitality, whereas, with these images, it's almost TOO much. The architecture should stand by itself and be complimented by the life engaging it. This almost feels like bad architecture being covered up. Was it Frank Lloyd Wright that said, "[SIZE=2][SIZE=2][SIZE=2]A doctor can bury his mistakes but an architect can only advise his client to plant vines."[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE]

Good image Edwin. I suggest to check the montague methods in order to make the image smoothier.